This paper explores the interrelated notions of market and consumption in Qing China as they were articulated within the framework of minsheng (民生 People's Livelihood)—an important trope of imperial political legitimacy which assigned to the state the responsibility for guaranteeing the people's livelihood (養民 "nurturing the people") and maintaining political stability (安民 "pacifying the people"). Drawing from the writings of Qing officials and intellectuals, this paper argues that, far from being rigid and formulaic, this general framework allowed much flexibility. Diverse and competing views on the market emerged, influenced by local economic circumstances and historically contingent factors. Alternative conceptualizations, however, continued to rely on minsheng legitimacy. A tension arose between pragmatic economic views and the desire to avoid political destabilization. |
本文探讨清代中国的市场和消费这两个观念。这两个相互关联的观念都在"民生"的框架下得以表述,而民生是帝制政治合法性的重要比喻,它把保证人民生计("养民")和维持政治稳定("安民")的职责分配给政府。通过对清代官员和知识分子著述的分析,本文认为这一基本框架远不是严格而程式化的。与此相反,它有着相当大的灵活性。在地方经济环境和具有历史偶然性的因素影响下,各种关于市场的多元且互相竞争的观点出现了。 |